Five things on Friday #166

Things of note for the week ending Friday March 6th, 2016.

Things of note for the week ending Friday March 6th, 2016.

JPEG_20160304_212553_-908182714

1. GHOSTBUSTERS

So, the new trailer dropped.

Screen Shot 2016-03-04 at 21.49.39

I watched it. I thought, without really thinking, ‘Oh, y’know, that looks okaaay…’ – I wasn’t paying attention.

That’s my excuse, at least.

And then I saw this.

Screen Shot 2016-03-04 at 21.59.51

(click on the image to see the tweet)

And it changed my mind completely.

Completely.

I felt stupid. Small. And idiotic.

Watch the trailer, then click on the above image to see the tweet-chain that changes everything about it.

_______

__

2. CONTACTLESS NONSENSE

Seen this (or something like it) lately?

Screen Shot 2016-03-04 at 22.17.35

Yeeeeeaaah, it’s BS.

Like, complete and total B. S.

TL:DR – theoretically possible, but the crime would need to be very sophisticated, meaning it would be very rare. According to relevant entities, this crime has not been widely reported. You’d also get refunded. There are also bigger worries when it comes to contactless payment technology.

Want the facts? They’re right here.

Basically, feel free to go tell your crazy uncle on Facebook that he has no idea what he’s talking about.

_______

__

3. SORRY

As a great man once said: ‘Is it too late now to say sorry? ’cause I’m missing more than just your body, oh. Is it too late now to say sorry? Yeah, I know-oh-oh, that I let you down. Is it too late to say I’m sorry now?’

Now imagine said man was a Brit. He wouldn’t be asking if it were too late to say sorry. He would be saying sorry for asking, and then would apologise further for the interruption. And then maybe say sorry once more for the hell of it.

Why?

Let the Beeb explain.

_______

__

4. #NOFILTERFEB
It ended on Monday. I wrote about it when it started a little over a month ago, here. It’s ‘over’ now (well, as much as it can be).

If you missed it, you should go read the debrief.

Please.

_______

__

5. UNPUBLISHED AMAZING PHOTOS

unpublished-photos-national-geographic-found-52__880

From National Geographic, no less.

unpublished-photos-national-geographic-found-66__880

That’s two.

You’ll find another 23 over on Bored Panda.

If you’re a bored panda, you’ll enjoy this casual browse.

_______

__

Your bonuses this week are:

  • Shaken Cocktails have launched a bottle shop – YES GUYS.
  • Seen Deadpool? You gotta read this.
  • In the #OgilvyTrends2016 presentation (available on slideshare and presented most recently at the new Ogilvy Amphitheatre (see image at the top of this post) amazing) I said that we had hit ‘peak millennial’. The Drum asked some super smart people for their opinion on this and boy, did they give it. Great reading.

And that’s me done.

It’s the weekend! YES!

And you know you’re gonna spend it in front of Netflix, BINGE-WATCHING HOUSE OF CARDS — DON’T YOU?!

tumblr_nlg39a3ydX1tesiixo1_500

Whatley out.

x

 

Five things on Friday #165

Things of note for the week ending Friday February 26th, 2016.

Things of note for the week ending Friday February 26th, 2016.

JPEG_20160224_145418_992423826

People of the Internet, hello.

Oh, that reminds me of something. Do you have to give presentations or ever have to speak publicly at all? Next time, instead of saying ‘Good morning, ladies and gentlemen’ – say instead ‘Ladies and gentlemen, good morning’.

You see, by the time you’ve finished saying the former, the crowd have only just realised you were talking to them but missed the first bit because they were looking at their phones/still talking etc. In the case of the latter, you’re addressing the crowd first and only then do you say ‘Good morning’ (or good evening, or whatever).

Try it.

And when it works, explain it to the audience too.

Right then, we have some things to get through don’t we?

Onwards!

1. #OBAMAANDKIDS

This hashtag is adorable*.

Screen Shot 2016-02-26 at 21.24.58

There’s so much to say about this wonderful, wonderful thing. Business Insider has a great run down of the 60 best photos, Twitter made a moment, and Time has a piece on it too.

This:

We’ll probably never truly be able to measure the impact that President Barack Obama has had on our children. As we enter the final year of his presidency, we will cherish and hold onto the great moments of progress and accomplishment. We will celebrate not just Barack Obama as a president, but also as a husband and a father. A man who has led this country with a deep love for all of it citizens, especially the ones who have yet to understand the historical meaning of the past eight years.

Beautiful.

Go browse the links above and enjoy.

*Yep, never said that before.

—___—

2. NASA’S TRAVEL DESTINATIONS

These have been around the block over the past fortnight but they’re simply too gorgeous to ignore.

Visit Mars!

mars

Visit Europa!

europa

Visit HD 40307g!

superearth

There are more (with some interesting copy too) over at the source.

_____________

3. WATCHING ROCKY II WITH MUHAMMAD ALI

This is one of my favourite reads of the week:

ali

July 31st, 1979. And this Roger Ebert is at Muhammad Ali’s mansion to accompany him to a special screening of the newly released Rocky II.

It’s at this point in the FToF proceedings that I tend to pull out a direct quote or paraphrase something from the article I’m imploring you to read.

Not this time. No no.

This time you’re just going to have to go read it (it’s won’t be disappointed).

_—_

4. PHOTO OF THE WEEK

You’ve all seen it.

zuckerbergvr

But what you may not have seen is this killer opening paragraph from The Verge:

The image above looks like concept art for a new dystopian sci-fi film. A billionaire superman with a rictus grin, striding straight past human drones, tethered to machines and blinded to reality by blinking plastic masks. Golden light shines down on the man as he strides past his subjects, cast in gloom, toward a stage where he will accept their adulation. Later that night, he will pore across his vast network and read their praise, heaped upon him in superlatives, as he drives what remains of humanity forward to his singular vision.

AMAAAAAAAAAAAAAAZING.

That is all.

_-_-_

5. CAKE OR DEATH?
This isn’t an Izzard story (but I do love this retort) – sorry. It’s just an excuse to post some photos of amazing cakes.

Don’t want death? OK – cake it is.

All out of cake

Screen Shot 2016-02-26 at 22.18.17

Screen Shot 2016-02-26 at 22.18.31

There are many more…. at the link!

_-_-___-_-_

… ./

Bonuses this week are as follows:

  • Beyonce at it again? And by ‘again’ I mean, this example from ages ago. The FTC will not be happy, yo.
  • Lol.
  • I’m a big fan of The Awl but this week’s edition properly made me laugh.
  • Remember in November (see item 2) when I said that Facebook’s new ‘immersive ad’ unit would launch in Q1 of 2016? Nailed it.
  • I wrote a blog post this week about how the launch of Sky Q made me reconsider my Sky TV package, end up cancelling the whole thing, and replace it with an Amazon Fire TV. It’s one of the most popular posts of the past 12mths. If you missed it, you can find it here.

And that’s it, I’m out.

Anyone got a Darth Vader outfit I can borrow?

N3qMTOi6NKM6Bjn

 

 

Sacking off Sky TV

Or how the launch of the Sky Q made me reconsider EVERYTHING.

Or how the launch of the Sky Q made me reconsider my options and eventually cancel the near £1100 per year fees for a satellite service I don’t really need in exchange for the rather awesome Amazon Fire TV 4K.

file

Look everybody, Sky Q is here!

Doesn’t it look fantastic? I’ve been very excited about this launch for some time now and honestly thought I’d probably be one of the first people to sign up to it.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Thing is, when it all came out in the open and all the features, specs, and (crucially) pricing details were released, I realised that perhaps Sky Q wasn’t for me.

What’s more, there was such a negative halo effect from this decision that it made me reconsider my subscription to Sky TV as a whole.

giphy (1)

Some background:

I’ve had a 4K TV for just over two years now and, being one of the first off the shelf, some of the apps have never, and will never, be updated to deliver the 4K content that it desires. It was entirely out of reach, I just needed a new set-top box to make it happen (eg: if I really wanted to enjoy Netflix in 4K, I’d have to drop another £350 on this stupid piece of kit and I didn’t really want to do that).

When I heard about Sky Q I thought: ‘Ah ha! This is just the ticket!’ – and so I waited, and waited… and waited.

In the interim a few things happened: I looked at the Nvidia Shield TV – a perfectly reasonable solution. You pay for the set top box, get all the 4K goodness  thrown in, and hey – it doubles up as a gaming rig too. All for $200USD (about £140).

I asked my friend Matt what he thought about the Shield (sidenote: this 4K conversation has been going on for the best part of 24mths – the man has the patience of a saint) and he said ‘Sounds great but why not get an Amazon Fire TV? It’s pretty much the same but half the price’ – I checked, and Matt was right.

It was.

7151EtSI0lL._SL1000_

Well, not exactly half-price but at £79.99, it was a lot more palatable than £140. Which was nice.

‘But I really like having Sky Movies!’ – I said to myself.

And so I did nothing.

A few months later, Amazon had a special offer on: for one month only, you could buy Amazon Prime (free next day delivery + Amazon Prime video) for just £59 for the whole year. If you shop regularly at Amazon enough then saving on the delivery costs is worth that alone.

You’ll have to do the sums yourself though.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

I did said sums and for the delivery savings alone, I subscribed.

It was around this time that Sky announced the full Sky Q feature set. Key point: 4K (aka UHD) content isn’t scheduled to appear until later in 2016 (damn) and the main focus of the whole thing is/was on multi-screen viewing (not interested).

Oh, and the price? £299 up front for the set top box and then an extra £50-odd a month.

giphy

It was at this point Amazon went and knocked the price of the Fire TV 4K down to £65.

You can guess what happened next:

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

And five days later, I gave Sky the 31 days notice it needs to cancel a TV subscription.

Easy.

And all because of Sky Q.

__________________

Facts:

  • My monthly package with Sky (movies, HD, 3D, family/variety packs – no sports) came to £90.65 a month. That’s £1087.80 per year. Ouch.
  • Amazon Prime was £59 for the first year (normal price £79), works out at £4.91 per month (normal price £6.58).
  • I’m not giving up Sky completely. I’m a Sky Fibre customer and as part of the cancellation process they sweetened the deal and I’ve now got monthly unlimited Internet for just over £20pcm.
  • Also, it turns out that if you cancel Sky TV, your box will still work as a Freeview box pulling in the standard free-to-air stuff you might find on other branded TV boxes – which is handy.
  • In total, I’ve dropped from paying £1087.80 per year to just over £300 per year (even with the initial outlay of the Fire TV box – that’s still a HUGE saving).

Amazing.

Thanks Sky Q!

 

 

 

 

Five things on Friday #164

Things of note for the week ending Friday February 19th, 2016.

Things of note for the week ending Friday February 19th, 2016.

Screen Shot 2016-02-20 at 00.33.56

Before we kick off, quite a few of you got in touch to tell me that you couldn’t access the ‘Dumb ass stuff we need to stop saying to Dads’ post from last week’s bonus items.

I’ve no idea why the original author’s website is [now] private, however I did find it republished over on Huffington Post (same author!). So go check it out.

I’m a Dad, and I appreciated this – much.

1. MOBILE, SMARTPHONES, AND HINDSIGHT

Ben Evans is off to Mobile World Congress. As he sets off on his grand adventure, he reflects upon how the conference used to look some ten-fifteen years ago.

My, has it changed.

download

A good read for myriad reasons but, if you’ve ever worked in or even had a passing interest/sway towards all things mobile – go read Ben’s latest post.

___________________

2. I SAW DEADPOOL

02-Deadpool

Seen it yet? Yes? What did you think? No? Why not?

Me? I thought it was ace. Definitely worth seeing too; to my mind it’s a pretty good antidote to every superhero film you’ve ever seen ever.

That said, James Gunn, director of the last super amazing comic-book-film-that-everyone-thought-would-fail-because-it-was-so-unlike-everything-else-that-came-before-it (Guardians of the Galaxy), gave a pretty good quote on why he thinks it works.

Clue: it isn’t what Hollywood thinks.

Ahem –

“After every movie smashes records people here in Hollywood love to throw out the definitive reasons why the movie was a hit,” he said. “I saw it happen with Guardians. It ‘wasn’t afraid to be fun’ or it ‘was colorful and funny’ etc etc etc. And next thing I know I hear of a hundred film projects being set up ‘likeGuardians,’ and I start seeing dozens of trailers exactly like the Guardians trailer with a big pop song and a bunch of quips. Ugh. Ugh. Ugh. Ugh. Ugh. Ugh.

“Deadpool wasn’t that,” he continued. “Deadpool was its own thing. THAT’S what people are reacting to. It’s original, it’s damn good, it was made with love by the filmmakers, and it wasn’t afraid to take risks. For the theatrical experience to survive, spectacle films need to expand their definition of what they can be. They need to be unique and true voices of the filmmakers behind them. They can’t just be copying what came before them.

“So, over the next few months, if you pay attention to the trades, you’ll see Hollywood misunderstanding the lesson they should be learning with Deadpool. They’ll be green lighting films ‘like Deadpool’ — but, by that, they won’t mean ‘good and original’ but ‘a raunchy superhero film’ or ‘it breaks the fourth wall.’ They’ll treat you like you’re stupid, which is the one thing Deadpool didn’t do.

“But hopefully in the midst of all this there will be a studio or two that will take the right lesson from this — like Fox did with Guardians by green-lighting Deadpool — and say, ‘Boy, maybe we can give them something they don’t already have.’ And that’s who is going to succeed.”

Shame Hollywood isn’t listening though.

___________________

3. APPLE VS THE FBI

Screen Shot 2016-02-19 at 23.39.33

You’ve probably read the letter already. But what you probably haven’t read is this excellent explanation of the entire sitch via Troy Hunt.

Definitely worth five minutes of your time.

And, when you’re done there, catch up on the latest updates still developing.

___________________

4. STEVE MARTIN DOES STAND UP

19-steve-martin-stand-up-1.w529.h352.2x

Big woop, right? No no, really. It really is.

This is a wonderful article.

Well, it would be. Except, I saw Steve Martin – LIVE – in person at the Montreal Just For Laughs festival in July 2010.

4803184382_9f4c8fa7e4_z

(that’s my actual thumb)

I remember it being a huge deal because a) he hadn’t done stand up in SO long and b) in the history of the show, he had never appeared at the Just For Laughs festival – EVER. So the festival had a lot to celebrate. Anyway, Martin was charming, musical, and very, very funny. I felt so lucky and blessed to have seen it and experienced it.

Just like the author of this article.

Sincerely, do read it – it is an excellent piece.

___________________

5. FRIGHTENED RABBIT

Screen Shot 2016-02-20 at 00.29.46

Frightened Rabbit used to be one of my favourite bands. They came out with an incredible debut album, stayed number one of my all time top played Spotify tracks/playlist for like, ever, and then… well, and then I went to see them live and afterwards in the bar the lead singer unsuccessfully attempted to chat up my then girlfriend.

You can kinda go off people sometimes.

THAT SAID… FR have a new album on the way out and you can listen to the new track from said LP right here.

I hold a grudge for no man.

___________________

Bonuses this week are as follows.

  • I was supposed to include this ‘How to Snapchat like a pro‘ article in last week’s edition (when it was fresh news). Chances are you’ve read it already. If not? Read it now.
  • Some words are great metaphors, ‘Rape’ is not one of them <- I thought long and hard about putting this one in but honestly, it’s an important conversation to have and something to think about, and even call out, when you hear it being thrown around in such a way. The article articulates it far better than I ever could – so go read it.
  • Agency navel-gazing or genuine industry change? I wrote some words re: ‘digital’ job titles (would love your input).
  • Why I walked out of Zoolander 2
  • In our 2016 Digital Trends, Marshall Manson and I said to lookout for mobile networks moving into the adblocking space. Oh, lookie here.

….

..

.

And that’s me… now go enjoy your weekend!

tumblr_nyg2zfH0vZ1rylzllo1_400

Thoughts on ‘Digital’ job titles

Aka: ‘Creating noise where there was no signal in the first place’

Back in January, associate professor of marketing, brand expert, and Marketing Week columnist, Mark Ritson, published a piece on the ‘death of digital’ job titles.

It went a little something like this:

Screen Shot 2016-02-15 at 21.26.31

If you’re familiar with Ritson’s column, you can pretty much imagine the rest. I’m not one to bite when bait is so blatantly waggled in one’s direction but this is something that I’ve been niggling on for a while and, the other day, said niggle floated to the surface…

Via what some of you might refer to as ‘a mini Tweetstorm’:

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Oh wait, a bit of background first. In case you missed it, Ritson’s piece came in response to another huge piece of industry news (January’s a slow news month) and that was [ad agency] Adam & Eve DDB’s move to ‘axe’ said D word from all job titles.

Ritson said:

The news that adam&eveDDB has dropped the digital designation from all its job titles came as no surprise last week. Despite the prevalence of the D word and the omnipresence of digital planners, digital strategists and digital marketers under every lamp post, nobody in the know ever doubted that the prefix would eventually become an anachronism.

And, unsurprisingly, the article (and the ‘news’ it referenced) became the talk of the town (which, when you think about it, is a&eDDB’s raison d’être).

And now everybody’s talking about it.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

What I actually meant was #PredictionsBreakfast (hey, I was grumpy – I got it wrong). You know the event I’m talking about, right? It’s the one where I said this:

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Someone in the audience (I think – it might’ve been Andy Oakes challenging us) asked the question ‘Are digital job titles dead?’ – I think my response was something along the lines of a big sigh, laughter, and then ‘no’.

Which is kinda how I got to the next bit –  

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

And I’d say that’s a fair enough comment. The term ‘digital’ means so many different things to so many different brands, agencies, publishers, partners, vendors – the list goes on – to simply ‘do away with it’ because it seems on trend is quite possibly the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard.

That said, I mean what I say: it could become redundant one day, maybe a generation from now – when the entire marketing job suite fully understands and gets what it means (and to whom). But that’s not going to happen this year and I very much doubt it’ll happen in the next.

And…

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Which means that for the brands, campaigns, and projects that we work on, digital is a core component to nearly all of them. Do our partners need a experts? Undoubtedly. Do they feel more comfortable knowing they have a specialist on the case? Definitely. Would they give two hoots if we dropped it completely? Probably not.

But in the same way that products are designed to meet a consumer need, so are jobs created to meet client demand.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

A small correction on this point. If you only read the headlines, you’d be forgiven* for thinking that a&eDDB had killed ‘digital’ only to replace it with the word ‘interactive’. The truth, as always, is slightly different. What a&eDDB have actually done is recategorised media into three areas: film, display, and interactive (more on that later).

So yes, replacing digital with interactive is a mistake – but let’s be clear: that is not what has happened here.

What has happened is that someone’s kick-started an intelligent debate about how we move the industry forward – and that a great thing (and should be commended).

Mark Ritson loves a rant (and I love him – sincerely, if you ever get a chance to see him lecture, GO), but on this there is a simple response: the industry just isn’t there yet.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

…which means we’ll continue to have digital strategists, creatives, directors, etc… whatever’s required to get the job done.

Because ultimately, isn’t that the most important thing?

Thanks for reading.

JW.

__________________________

APPENDIX

– aka, related Tweets that I could find commentary for but are still worth your time.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Also

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

And my personal favourite…

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

 

*By ‘forgiven’, I mean ‘not forgiven at all’ – you should work harder at knowing more.

Five things on Friday #163

Things of note for the week ending Friday February 12th, 2016.

Things of note for the week ending Friday February 12th, 2016.

JPEG_20160212_194333_-1385840912

Hello and welcome to this week’s Five things on Friday. It’s been 163 editions of this bad boy now and, as I write this to you, I wonder if you’re out there… and how you’re doing.

Do let me know.

Shall we?

1. THE TWITTER ALGORITHM (AND HOW TO TURN IT OFF)

KjVxoEX

^ Which was pretty much the reaction of the entire Internet ^

In case you’ve been living under a rock for the past two months, you’d be forgiven for not knowing a single thing about this:

Screen Shot 2016-02-12 at 21.10.24

If you missed the memo: Twitter now has an algorithm. The point of which is to serve up the Tweets that it thinks you’ll want to see first. And by ‘first’, it means – when you open the app. After that, you can just pull down on the app as per and you’ll go back to your normal timeline.

Lovely.

A few things to note –

First, it’s not that bad! Give it a go, you might like it.

Second, any marketers out there throwing your toys out because you want traditional Twitter, just stop. Think about it for a moment – all those [average] users out there who’ll wake up with this feature switched on and just won’t switch it off? I’d gamble the number would be quite high. These users, they’re the ones you’re talking to. So why not ensure you’re having the same experience as those people? Y’know, so you’ve got an idea about what you’re actually talking about?

Third, if you’re still freaking out about it – here’s how you turn it off:

Web:

Screen Shot 2016-02-10 at 14.07.11
iOS:

Screen Shot 2016-02-10 at 14.07.39
Android:

Screen Shot 2016-02-10 at 14.07.42

So that’s that. All clear? Great.

Shall we move on?

Oh! Wait! Bonus Twitter stuff!

I got asked for a quote about what it this all means for brands. The published version looked like this:

“These changes will have little to no impact,” claimed James Whatley, digital director Ogilvy & Mather, “ultimately the best content will shine through.”

Discussing tests Twitter ran around organic tweets and posts from events, both of which noted an increase in user engagement, he told The Drum: “As a result, two kinds of things will happen. On one hand you’ll have the knee-jerk marketer, who will quickly try to fill their content calendars with more organic content covering a vast array of live events.

“On the other, the savvy marketer, who will continue with their well thought-through content strategy and perhaps keep an out on when this change might become relevant to the brand that they work on.”

The unedited version is below (my answers in italics):

How will brands adapt their content to riff off and make best use of these latest developments?

For our many of our clients, these changes will have little to no impact. Ultimately, the best content shines through. Twitter itself stated that with this feature switched on, users Tweet and Retweet more on the platform meaning brands such as Pizza Hut Delivery, Kronenbourg 1664, or WWF can reach a more engaged potential audience.

What impact will the move have on the way brands produce organic content around trending topics?

Twitter ran some tests that proved that organic Tweets from brands, as well as Tweets around live events; both saw an increase in user engagement. As a result, two kinds of things will happen. On one hand you’ll have the knee-jerk marketer, who will quickly try to fill their content calendars with more organic content covering a vast array of live events. On the other, the savvy marketer, who will continue with their well thought-through content strategy and perhaps keep an out on when this change might become relevant to the brand that they work on.

What will be the main concerns for brands/marketers around new timeline?

The main concerns will be around how it’ll effect the monthly reporting. The lower end of the poor performing content will get poorer and poorer. And explaining that one away YoY will be tough. There’s one simple rule: [it’s like Facebook all over again] don’t make awful content.

I’ve been quite bullish on things like this of late. Maybe it’s the now 10 years I’ve been working in digital now. Crumbs. Maybe.

———————————————

2. A NEW 3D PRINTER (IT’S SO FAST)

Screen Shot 2016-02-12 at 23.11.52

I’ve 3D printed stuff before. It’s amazing but it takes TIME. And lots of it. Hours, days, weeks even. Especially for complicated jobs. It’s hard enough to make the tech go mainstream as it is – even in the face of such expensive hardware – that level of time investment just isn’t viable.

There’s a new process in town though, it’s called ‘The Intelligent Liquid Interface’, and it speeds up 3D printing to this level –

2016-02-12 23_23_10

Well, that might be sped up slightly but look at the minute counter on the bottom left – 0 to 8mins and boom, super quick 3D printing!

I think this is awesome.

Fastco.exist has more.

———————————————

3. TARANTINO (TWICE)

taxi-driver1-670x328

I stumbled across these couple of videos this week. They’re pretty old but I really enjoyed them. They’re two interviews with Tarantino as he discusses one of his all time favourite films, Taxi Driver. If you’re a fan of either Tarantino or Taxi Driver, then go watch them.

That is all.

———————————————

4. FORMATION DOESN’T INCLUDE ME (AND THAT’S JUST FINE)

1--0is_LeW16vj3Yp5QVWD7w

The above image, and title, are taken from an incredible piece by Kate Forristall. There is a lot that’s been both said and written about Beyoncé’s performance at the Superbowl.

This is one of the many that stood out.

(the article she links to halfway through it pretty amazing too)

If you missed it, then go educate yourself.

If you didn’t miss it, then go read it and add more to your POV.

———————————————

5. THE EX-AMERICANS

Screen Shot 2016-02-12 at 23.41.31

How’s this:

According to the US Treasury, a record 4,279 individuals renounced their US citizenship or long-term residency in 2015 – an increase of 20% on the previous year, which was itself a record-breaking year. In 2010, just 1,006 gave up being US citizens, but since then the numbers have risen every year.

The main suspected reason? Tax. Or in the case of Americans working overseas: double taxation. I’d heard of this before but the BBC has a really good piece on it and once you read it, you’ll understand why so many US citizens are considering renouncing the nation that makes them so proud.

———————————————

Bonuses this week are as follows:

Right then, that’s me.

tumblr_ns7badNJSZ1rx1fkzo1_500

Off to bed.

Whatley out.

 

Five things on Friday #162

Things of note for the week ending Friday February 5th, 2016.

Things of note for the week ending Friday February 5th, 2016.

JPEG_20160205_160155_551414151

Well, last week was a bit of a crapshoot wasn’t it? To those of you that read the newsletter of this lovely weekly listicle, my sincerest apologies for the double whammy last week. I had

1. THESE GIRLS

row-like-a-girl-cross-the-finish-line-of-the-talisker-whisky-atlantic-challenge-l-r-olivia-bolesworth-gee-purdy-bella-collins-and-lauren-morton-credit-ben-duffy

Four girls, 3000 miles, and two world records.

No big deal.

Gee Purdy, second from the left (bright orange top – screaming with joy), works at Ogilvy. From the moment the company found out she (and her team) had an ambition to not only become the youngest but also the fastest all-woman crew to cross the Atlantic – BY ROWING – everyone got behind her.

This week, they smashed it.

And this write up, courtesy of Stylist, is actually really quite effing awesome. Read it to find out about the highs, lows, whales, dolphins and an overall two fingers up to all things sexism.

Gee – I’m proud to work under the same roof as you.

This is an incredible achievement.

Blaze new trails indeed.

2. THOSE TOPSY REPLACEMENTS
Topsy was such a good social media search engine that it was once even referenced in an episode of The Newsroom (yeah, Sorkin was all like ‘Yeah, Dev Patel’s character knows how to do this because X’) and now? Now it is dead. At the tail end of last year, Topsy searched its last Tweet.

And you can thank/blame Apple for that.

Idiots.

Anyway, if you’re now completely stuck on what to use when searching your favourite social media platform, Link Humans has compiled a handy list of [potential] replacements.

None of them are as good as Topsy but nearly all of them will get you mostly there.

Mostly.

___

3. THAT MAIL RAIL

24817940225_7ae8340f09_z

I have a list of fairly airy fairy rules when it comes to FToF. One of those rules is never really letting anyone completely hijack a ‘thing’. As in, if there’s something cool out there and it has found its way to me – then *I* will be the one to write about it.

I’m breaking that this time around – but for good reason. A couple of weeks ago – an AMAZING individual thought to invite me along to the press launch/announcement of the brand new Postal Museum opening in London next year (yes, 2017).

The main attraction of which is the actual ‘Mail Rail’ line that runs under London.

At the very last minute (literally, 12hrs before) I had to cancel.

Gutted.

(Thanks a lot [REDACTED])

The good news is: the smart people in charge of the PR for the Postal Museum gave me a plus one which meant my long-time partner in crime, Robbie Dale, was able to go along [albeit without his heterosexual life partner].

Fun facts about Mail Rail (via Robbie):

  • Mail Rail runs deep under London for 6.5 miles and was first used in 1927 to transport our mail seamlessly and silently throughout the city.
  • The Rosetta Stone was stored in its tunnels during the First World War along with art treasures from the National Portrait Gallery to protect them from Zeppelin air raids.
  • At its peak, Mail Rail employed over 200 staff and carried more than six million bags of mail below ground each year – that’s four million letters every day.
  • Mail Rail was preceded by an 1860s pneumatic rail system where cars loaded with mail were propelled through tunnels by air. Running between Euston Station and Eversholt. Street, operators sometimes had to turn down requests from men on their way home from the pub who were desperate for a ride.
  • Mail Rail at The Postal Museum will transport visitors back in time on a 15-minute ride through a section of the tunnels and reveal the fascinating story of innovation and ingenuity that kept us all in touch. 

Thanks Robbie!

Mr Dale is also a dab hand with a camera so if photos like this:

24817944505_2085bc8ff2_z

…really excite you, then you should go check out Robbie’s Flickr album of the Mail Rail and then, once you’ve done that, go look up the Postal Museum and plan your visit (for 2017 – when it opens).

I know I’m going to.

4. THIS MIRROR

1-HA9xBf-0jZH_zDmSrGBNpQ

Yep. It’s real.

Max Braun, product maker at Google, decided that he’d had enough of waiting around for the future to arrive so he just built it instead.

The above image is nabbed from this Medium post on the subject of how he did and, being only a 3 or 4 minute read, I can’t suggest enough that you go and check it out.

Super geeky. Super interesting.

Want one.

___

5. DIS GUY

sno

Actual bullet time footage (the stuff that put The Matrix on the map – or maybe the other way around), made with a single spinning iPhone, snapping photos of the subject as the handset twirls in the air. Like a selfie-stick, but on steroids (and with less ‘ugh’).

This is the ‘centriphone’ and it is amazing.

There’s video at the source too.

Go check it out.

Tres cool.

_________

Bonuses this week are as follows:

 

And that’s me.

 

Five things on Friday #161

Things of note for the week ending Friday January 29th, 2016.

Things of note for the week ending Friday January 29th, 2016.

JPEG_20160128_120530_1624304460 (1)

First off, apologies to those of you who wanted to read The London Escalator Experiment last week. Muggins forgot to link it. Well, in case you didn’t get around to JUST GOOGLING IT, you can find the article right here (and it’s still awesome reading).

Shall we crack on with the new stuff?

OK then!

1. #NOFILTERFEB

I like this.

Ø_Facebook_Profile_Photo

“MAKING THINGS LOOK EFFORTLESS TAKES EFFORT”

As the website says:

“It’s easy to forget sometimes that social media is a collection of hand picked moments. What we see has usually gone through a few edits to look the way it does. It isn’t always the full picture and it shouldn’t be a benchmark we set for our own lives.

#NoFilterFeb is a challenge to detox your Instagram of all the filters that have become a default go to.

By dedicating a whole month to being filter free we’re hoping to bring a bit of perspective back into news feeds and use it as a reminder that the world doesn’t always need a touch up.”

There are a TON of reasons why this is an awesome idea.

Most of them stem from the whole OH MY GOD THIS FILTERED PERCEPTION OF LIFE THAT WE ALL PROJECT OUTWARDS IS A HUGE LIE AND IS CAUSING HUGE EXISTENTIAL CRISES OF DEPRESSION ALL AROUND US thing.

Y’know, this stuff:

taunted

Actual. Cultural. Impact.

For reals.

This February, go properly no filter.

Go #NoFilterFeb.

Oh and unlike dry January, this exercise might actually be good for you.

——-

2. A FULL DAY OF MUSIC VOL. 3

CHOONz

It’s that time again.

Eight hours of fairly decent music compiled (by me and my mate Sarah) into a one hit Spotify playlist for all your aural needs.

Get it.

(or read about it)

You’re welcome.

3. THE F*** OFF FUND

This was doing the rounds a couple of weeks ago and I finally got around to reading it last week. It’s painful reading. But – especially if you have children – print it off and save it somewhere.

Powerful stuff.

4. CRY HAVOC

tumblr_nxliywpQg21s2a55yo1_1280

My friend (and some time film quiz enemy) Tiny Master sent me the PDF of issue one of the above comic book a couple of weeks ago and it’s pretty awesome.

So we’re clear: this is the book The Guardian called “a joy to read”, the Nerdist called “flawless,” and Alan Moore described as “an electrifying account of black ops, black dogs and weaponised folklore unlike anything you’ve ever seen – best in show.”

It’s about a lesbian werewolf who goes to war and to say much more about it would probably mean SPOILERS.

Looking for a new read? Go pick up CRY HAVOC.

It’s really, really quite good.

(and I’m hooked).

Side note: Tiny Master also called me an actual ‘cross-discipline connoisseur of culture’ (to be fair, it was followed by a ‘oh sod off’ but still) and that’s a WIN from me no matter what.

Read more about Cry Havoc over on its dedicated Tumblr page.

5. WORF EMAIL

Screen Shot 2016-01-29 at 21.58.31

A Twitter account set up for the sole purpose of sharing the entirely fictional emails from the Starship Enterprise’s Chief of Security?

OK. I AM IN.

Screen Shot 2016-01-29 at 22.00.43

SOLID.

GOLD.

Go get.

——–

Bonuses this week are as follows:

Thanks y’all.

Imma go hit my weekend now.

BYEEEEEEEE.

WEEEEEE

 

Five things on Friday #160

Things of note for week ending Friday 22nd January, 2016.

Things of note for week ending Friday 22nd January, 2016.

JPEG_20160121_230653_-112487905

Well, that was a CRAZY BUSY WEEK wasn’t it?

It’s 17:48 in a Friday evening and I’ve got approximately 42mins before I’m due in the bar to celebrate my FOUR YEAR ANNIVERSARY of working for the big O.

Shall we?

1. THE BIG SHORT

The-Big-Short-teaser-poster1-e1445275948938

Earlier this week, those lovely people at Paramount invited yours truly to a special screening of this quite frankly fantastic film that you should all make time to see.

As the poster above states, THE BIG SHORT is based on a true story (and the film quite neatly points out which bits are completely true and which bits perhaps aren’t – it’s very well done); covering the financial crisis and specifically highlighting a group of people that both a) spotted it coming and then b) betted on it actually happening – it’s an incredible tale. Some parts of which you will hold your head in your hands in complete and utter disbelief.

It is hilarious, heartbreaking, sickening, and ultimately makes you feel good about being left to feel empty and helpless (no, really) and I can’t endorse that you see this film enough.

The four main leads…

external

-Ryan Gosling, Steve Carrell, Brad Pitt, Christian Bale-

…are brilliant but special mentions to Gosling and Carrell for individual brilliance (that you’ll only recognise when you of course, go and see it).

So if you don’t have plans this weekend or next week in fact, go and see THE BIG SHORT.

The part with Margot Robbie made me laugh so loud people looked at me.

2. BRANDS PREFER NATIVE

This is interesting.

Screen Shot 2016-01-22 at 17.51.35

YouTube links now equate to less than 25% of all video content shared by brands on Facebook.

The above grab is from this article over on eMarketer. Published earlier this month, it points to one of the outputs of ‘The Video Royale’ – a trend that Marshall Manson and I highlighted at this time last year.

In short: at the turn of 2015 we challenged/advised brands, both within our agency network and without, to – in the face of the incoming Video platform wars – be prepared to ’embrace native video publishing’. By that we meant uploading raw video content direct to the platform you’re sharing it on and not simply sharing the link to your YouTube page…

Go and look at the chart above again. Go on, I’ll wait here.

..

I’m not saying that these numbers are a result of said call to arms however it is quite reassuring to see that this is the way the trend is [predictably] going.

etc

3. GERVAIS

Another thing I found this week was this TIME article talking about the difference between British and American humour. Written by one Mr Ricky Gervais, it is an excellent read.

But the bonus part of the article that really put me in a chipper mood were the accompanying collection of video interviews embedded within..

THEY ARE SO GOOD.

Go for the writing, stay for the videos.

4. GAMESMASTER

This is great.

GAMESMASTER

Were you a young gamer in the 90s? Do you remember seeing Patrick Moore rehashed as some batsh*t crazy master of gaming (above)?!

Then you’ll love this: ‘GAMESMASTER: The Inside Story

Containing such AMAZING nuggets as exactly how Mr Moore was paid…

Cynics might assume Moore was only in it for the money, but they’d be wrong. McAllister still remembers the salary negotiation: “Patrick said, ‘Ah, yes. Well, I did something before and they asked me what my fee should be, and I told them, and we drank it.’ That was his approach – a bottle of whisky.” Moore was never on the set of the live show. His sections were filmed separately over a couple of days and then he and the production team would go out to lunch.

Brilliant.

It’s a long read but if you ever had a cheeky chuckle at one of Dominik Diamond’s double entendres then it’s 100% worth it.

5. THE LONDON ESCALATOR EXPERIMENT

One of my favourite reads of the week was this wonderful Guardian piece about when and why Transport for London stopped people walking UP escalators.

Screen Shot 2016-01-22 at 18.25.30

Monsters.

If you’re unfamiliar with this ridiculous idea, allow me to enlighten you:

“It’s British lore: on escalators, you stand on the right and walk on the left. So why did the London Underground ask grumpy commuters to stand on both sides? And could it help avert a looming congestion crisis?”

You start reading and you think they’re bonkers but, by the end, you (like me) could very well be convinced…

Cray cray.

..

.

Related anecdote:

The tube to work is funny now. I now have to get off at a nothing station. Southwark. I mean. Who gets off at Southwark?! All the Wharf-bounders get grumpy. ‘You used to be one of us’, they stare silently. They all have to move when I’m getting off now and they get proper narky about it

Silly people.

And yet I grin.

Upon departure I look ’em in the eyes and say, with an assertive clarity only matched by its cheerfulness, ‘Excuse me, team!’ – and I giggle.

Starts my day off brilliantly.

Try it!

Bonuses this week are as follows:

Have an awesome weekend y’all!

tumblr_nxk1gzDrFp1ul3kszo1_500

Whatley out.

 

 

 

A Full Day of Music Vol. 3

8hrs and 8mins. 127 tracks. In short: exactly what you’ve been looking for this entire time.

It’s that time again.

CHOONz

Volumes 1 and 2 are merely dreams of yesteryear.

How about we kick off 2016 with a brand new eight hour playlist, perfect for your ears, phone, office, etc… whatever – just a good solid FULL DAY OF MUSIC as curated by yours truly and my dear friend, Sarah Lang.

I asked Sarah how she might describe volume three, this is legit what she sent back:

‘[AFDoM V3 is] a mix that is up to the two equally important tasks of getting you to strut your stuff on the dance floor and getting you through those moments of existential angst. Or something. And also just great to have on while gsd.’

You can perhaps see now why we get on so well…

On Spotify? Go get.

Not on Spotify? Who even are you?

You go and enjoy A Full Day of Music Vol. 3 and Sarah and I will crack on with Vol. 4. See you back here again in a few months, yeah?

Yeah.